<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <title><![CDATA[gdgt - ea440dgbe's gdgt stream]]></title>
  <id>tag:gdgt.com,2009:/user</id>
  <link rel="self" href="http://user.gdgt.com/ea440dgbe/activity/feed"/>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://gdgt.com"/>
  <rights>Copyright (c) 2009, PastFuture</rights>
  <updated>2010-03-19T04:55:00-04:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Ryan Block</name>
    <uri>http://user.gdgt.com/ryan/</uri>
  </author>
  <generator uri="http://gdgt.com/">gdgt</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:gdgt.com,2009:/user/idds</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Started a new discussion about Apple iPad]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/apple/ipad/general/Nominate-a-better-name/"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<div align='center' class='home_feed_image'><a href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/apple/ipad/general/Nominate-a-better-name/"><img src="http://media.gdgt.com/img/product/19/f6v/ipad-1nb9-100.jpg" alt="" align="left" /></a></div>Nominate a better name?]]></content>
    <updated>2010-01-27T15:52:52-05:00</updated>
    <published>2010-01-27T15:52:52-05:00</published>
    <author>
      <name>ea440dgbe</name>
      <uri>http://user.gdgt.com/ea440dgbe/</uri>
    </author>
    <source/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:gdgt.com,2009:/user/h3xa</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Replied to a discussion about HTC Google Nexus One]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/htc/google/nexus-one/general/Coming-to-Verizon/page/2#post-1azv"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<div align='center' class='home_feed_image'><a href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/htc/google/nexus-one/general/Coming-to-Verizon/page/2#post-1azv"><img src="http://media.gdgt.com/img/product/17/dl4/google-nexus-one-1j33-100.jpg" alt="" align="left" /></a></div>i won&#39;t be really excited until they bring it to google wimax as a data phone]]></content>
    <updated>2010-01-05T14:46:57-05:00</updated>
    <published>2010-01-05T14:46:57-05:00</published>
    <author>
      <name>ea440dgbe</name>
      <uri>http://user.gdgt.com/ea440dgbe/</uri>
    </author>
    <source/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:gdgt.com,2009:/user/fc7h</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Added anjoyplanet to friend list]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://user.gdgt.com/anjoyplanet/"/>
    <updated>2009-11-24T14:59:11-05:00</updated>
    <published>2009-11-24T14:59:11-05:00</published>
    <author>
      <name>ea440dgbe</name>
      <uri>http://user.gdgt.com/ea440dgbe/</uri>
    </author>
    <source/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:gdgt.com,2009:/user/fc7f</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Added onitsoga to friend list]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://user.gdgt.com/onitsoga/"/>
    <updated>2009-11-24T14:59:06-05:00</updated>
    <published>2009-11-24T14:59:06-05:00</published>
    <author>
      <name>ea440dgbe</name>
      <uri>http://user.gdgt.com/ea440dgbe/</uri>
    </author>
    <source/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:gdgt.com,2009:/user/fc7d</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Replied to a discussion about Google Chrome OS]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/google/chrome-os/support/Pathetic-Uses-100-CPU-in-Vmware-6/page/1#post-17dp"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<div align='center' class='home_feed_image'><a href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/google/chrome-os/support/Pathetic-Uses-100-CPU-in-Vmware-6/page/1#post-17dp"><img src="http://media.gdgt.com/img/product/15/brs/google-chrome-os-od0-100.jpg" alt="" align="left" /></a></div>I&#39;m leaning towards thinking that they don&#39;t have any kind of hardware graphics support yet... this would explain the slowness and lack of resolution options.]]></content>
    <updated>2009-11-24T14:58:03-05:00</updated>
    <published>2009-11-24T14:58:03-05:00</published>
    <author>
      <name>ea440dgbe</name>
      <uri>http://user.gdgt.com/ea440dgbe/</uri>
    </author>
    <source/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:gdgt.com,2009:/user/esjv</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Started a new discussion about Google Chrome OS]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/google/chrome-os/general/My-Predictions/"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<div align='center' class='home_feed_image'><a href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/google/chrome-os/general/My-Predictions/"><img src="http://media.gdgt.com/img/product/15/brs/google-chrome-os-od0-100.jpg" alt="" align="left" /></a></div>My Predictions]]></content>
    <updated>2009-11-20T17:00:45-05:00</updated>
    <published>2009-11-20T17:00:45-05:00</published>
    <author>
      <name>ea440dgbe</name>
      <uri>http://user.gdgt.com/ea440dgbe/</uri>
    </author>
    <source/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:gdgt.com,2009:/user/ehpy</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Replied to a discussion about Google Chrome OS]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/google/chrome-os/general/What-are-your-expections/page/1#post-167u"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<div align='center' class='home_feed_image'><a href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/google/chrome-os/general/What-are-your-expections/page/1#post-167u"><img src="http://media.gdgt.com/img/product/15/brs/google-chrome-os-od0-100.jpg" alt="" align="left" /></a></div>btw check this out RE native code and such:

http://code.google.com/p/nativeclient/]]></content>
    <updated>2009-11-19T20:35:54-05:00</updated>
    <published>2009-11-19T20:35:54-05:00</published>
    <author>
      <name>ea440dgbe</name>
      <uri>http://user.gdgt.com/ea440dgbe/</uri>
    </author>
    <source/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:gdgt.com,2009:/user/ehkr</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Replied to a discussion about Google Chrome OS]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/google/chrome-os/general/What-are-your-expections/page/1#post-1679"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<div align='center' class='home_feed_image'><a href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/google/chrome-os/general/What-are-your-expections/page/1#post-1679"><img src="http://media.gdgt.com/img/product/15/brs/google-chrome-os-od0-100.jpg" alt="" align="left" /></a></div>hence the "same efficiency and power" bit... of course nobody would even consider using something like this if it wasn&#39;t just as fast as a windows box, and completely available offline. i do think they&#39;re working on that, though, because their projects usually seem to focus a lot on speed.]]></content>
    <updated>2009-11-19T17:03:45-05:00</updated>
    <published>2009-11-19T17:03:45-05:00</published>
    <author>
      <name>ea440dgbe</name>
      <uri>http://user.gdgt.com/ea440dgbe/</uri>
    </author>
    <source/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:gdgt.com,2009:/user/ehit</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Replied to a discussion about Google Chrome OS]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/google/chrome-os/general/What-are-your-expections/page/1#post-1670"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<div align='center' class='home_feed_image'><a href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/google/chrome-os/general/What-are-your-expections/page/1#post-1670"><img src="http://media.gdgt.com/img/product/15/brs/google-chrome-os-od0-100.jpg" alt="" align="left" /></a></div>what if google was also working on an easy way to locally run web code with the same efficiency and power as native code? a language (go) and a web standard(ajax, flash) perhaps? then add to that a wine web app that is broadly compatible with xp applications, etc]]></content>
    <updated>2009-11-19T15:56:07-05:00</updated>
    <published>2009-11-19T15:56:07-05:00</published>
    <author>
      <name>ea440dgbe</name>
      <uri>http://user.gdgt.com/ea440dgbe/</uri>
    </author>
    <source/>
  </entry>
</feed>
